Mastering Your Ideology

I am composing these articles due to the lack of gratification in the world. Remaining as religiously unbiased as possible, you have to be apparent to the fact that ideology and religion will clash coherently and I mean no offense in my ideals. The purpose is not to alter your beliefs, but to ascend them to the reality you actually practice in a mature consciousness. I say this because I strictly endorse the statement "The answers are not in one of us, they are in all of us." The sole basis of this is to formulate a technique to gain one's own personal answer to one's actual ideology delicate to the world. In order to advance individual passage as a notable entity in this modern day we innately set up our own rules in real-time, which weakens our character. This is a detrimental human trait, because it is impossible to constantly keep actively skewing inner-perspective. When a person habituates this thought mechanism they find themselves contradicting consistently. "You must be honest to yourself in order to be honest to others." It is a quote we must take to heart, because the ability to be genuine has been lost over the ages. If you observe this proclamation, one will come to realize that the more truthful one is to themselves, the more direct(integral) one will be to everything surrounding them(including others).

Finding that "authenticity is the mutual policy", is not only a way to strengthen your endeavor, but decisively a way to increase your mental amplitude. Which I define as the amount of contemplation one's mind can output without entering a state of confusion. This state of confusion will be represented as state V. When Subject A enters state V, they open their mind to the next reasonable opinion posed. The following plausible conception will then implant itself in Subject A's mind as a 1, not a 0. Referring to binary code, the most basic programming language, comparative to the mind, represents whether you have 0, a non-feasible response, or 1, a feasible response. Now this 1, which was rooted into Subject A's mind will be set there until the next person incorporates the same pertaining deliberation in the future(inception). Subject A will recollect the 1 embedded and exclaim it as their own views, because another was able to prove his/her point by showing Subject A's lack of tangible acknowledgment. The vital problem with this inclination is that both sides are not accurately presented by the apt degradation of the true opposition.

I am going to make the assumption that there is a two stratification approach that encompasses all sides of a large proportion of issues. Dualities are replete throughout history, most commonly found in religious scriptures, but more pertain-ably in nature. The sun rises, we see light. The sun sets, darkness comes upon us. Dark and Light, being the most ambiguous duality is personally defined as the subconscious means of good faith or the subconscious means of bad faith. Dark being negative fidelity, and light being positive fidelity. What people understood more readily in the past is that; they must comprehend both the positive and the negative, orderly to place their personal envision in the neutral, avoiding irremediable struggle. The negative bias to the dark has created existentialism. The positive bias to the light has created powerful disciplines and institutions. Without the ability to balance these or contain a successful intuition, people enter state V conflicting with their content. Not knowing whether to strictly interpret their ideology from indoctrination or placing their cards in negative fidelity; instinctively persuades people to fall to the 1. In this situation, 1 can be sought as an extreme form of overbearing rationality inducing a state V which manifests a deep selfishness in the psyche.

As explained before, when one has no tangible idea to express, one is indirectly forced to accept the others' visions of greater reason. This meta-exemplifies everyone's collective consciousness to only worry about the most personally beneficial answer and not necessarily the prevalent, holistic, sensible one. Obligating all to be egocentric, is a way to control emotion itself through a dogmatic form of mediums. "The keenness to see through all the forms of invasive incognito or manipulative medium will foretell your indispensable mediation." True emotion can be brandished only with those who can control his/her physical body and have the soundest mind. Constituting a select few who see the immediate truth, which will not be excluded in all contrivance over time. In my experiences, undoubted reactions empowers higher consciousness, but solely with a profound apprehension of these reactions will people be able to reach their highest conscious frame of being. One can only foresee so unfathomably in one form of thought before one finds themselves in a cycle or state V. This is why I believe one must be completely conscious of all the possible ways they can conceive an idea, and project them with their natural response in a relative manner to induce a collective solution. Not a way to prove oneself as a better individual, that is avoiding the point, rather an incentive to accelerate cognitive sights. A theory to support more than life. A purpose to unleash the embezzled potential of a human being.

P.S. Controversy contravenes capability.

To support a renounced knowledge of these dualities I speak of. We will start with the mental image of black and white. Think visually; conceive white on the right and black on the left as a mental projection. Then take that and let it decay to the middle until they reach a 50-50 gray. Next invert it. Now stack it above as depicted in the picture. One notices that every contrast has an innate spark of knowledge as one perceives it. Let us apply this to Subject A. He/she does this very same method, and he/she realizes that every evenly contrasting form of white and black correspond. With this correlation, his mind enters State V, and because he/she cannot tangibly calculate the percentage of black and white the two colors depict visibly; it embellishes him/her into this state. Embedded is the 1, for perceptively speaking it can also be viewed as the obvious. It is the equalization of the two colors, making the median color accessible.

Though it is not certified in words or any form of medium, we still have the lesser comprehension of the memory which can be empowered by ubiquity. This example can be retested by all opposite colors and basic geometry(rule of angles); having the general same affect. Applying it to thought is only possible if you entirely understand the polarity. Confirmation from a larger group cumulatively stacks median color or thought indefinitely more precise. With that being said, I will take a leap of faith and personify the movement of all things on a atomic-scale in the universe, stating:

"If everything has movement of some sort, then why would our thoughts seize to make this corresponding movement over time? Why can we not jump to this simple conclusion? Why can life not be blunt and apparent? The answers are as basic as the questions: We refuse to allow ourselves to have answers; we are implicitly stuck on a pursuit in life, or more commonly sought as the pursuit of happiness. But what happens if we truncate this pursuit, and modestly admit: we are alive, we are content, we are infinite, we will be congenial, we will perpetually endeavor, and we will attain progress. Sometimes you do have to look back to move forward, but you cannot be over-condescending of the past. For it will be destructive in one's immediate nature, and negatively influence one's future."

To create a series of rooted ideas will expose the whole. They tell you to think out of the box, and a diamond fits nicely around a box. Also does a circle, but Pi is an intangibly infinite number making the innate calculations improbable. Though, If you take a diamond and rotate it from the center it will create a perfect circle. From that circle, one can take the area by deriving successions of diamonds to a limit extending from the centric-diameter spanning from 90 to 270 degrees and the cross-diameter spanning from 180 to 360; creating a spherical object. Or as a simplistic approach, one can rotate the diamond from the center until one feels like they have conceived the honest nature of the duplicity. The most relevant is the diamond of origin by which the ideal is based. Exposing this root, helps identify its integral. Referring to article one, when dualities are exposed, you will always have the ability to branch to and from the negative or the positive of those polarities with acknowledgment.

The seven points of the diamond are each symbolic of a position. The complete left representing the negative fidelity and the complete right representing the positive fidelity. The top is one's meta-reality, spirit, or individuality. The bottom is the body or society. The very center of the diamond is the instantaneously consciousness(mind); or in terms of accountability, the synthesizer of body and spirit. The left section of the circle being the Masculine, and the right section being the Feminine. The complete left is the tendency to: look for the worst, not believe, and live by chaos theory. Accordingly, the complete right is the tendency to: look for the best, accept triangular laws, and live by reason. Then we ask; why should not everything be on the complete right? Continually looking for the best in people emanates naivety to the multitudes of people who live by the left. Similarly speaking, people who look for the worst emit naivety to people who live by the right. Now how do we solve this problem? "[one] must comprehend both the positive and the negative, orderly to place their[one's] personal envision in the neutral, avoiding irremediable struggle" (Preface). Sometimes we must accept our fate to take a neutral stance on a disposition; being that we are unable to change it, and it is beyond our will. Nevertheless, it is common to live by reason and laws; by virtue of its enlistment in the 1.

"An eye for an eye. If someone does something wrong in one's eyes. One must displace it correctly. The punishment is subject to equitable change by you; being inclusively coordinated by one's spirit, body, and mind. In complete order to gain respect by all."

"Time is of the essence." --Unknown

We cannot exactly say what time is. Though, we can vaguely apply it to the dimensions of a diamond: Spirit, above the present (present-progressive); society, below the present (present-digressive); instantaneous- consciousness, in the present (present-nature); the masculine, the immediate past; the feminine, the immediate future, the complete left, the past; and the complete right, the future.

In our age, we constantly see people who are too deep into the present-digressive causing them to lose the ability to see the immediate future. Alike, we ceaselessly see people who are too far in the present-progressive causing them avoid the immediate past. This being the point of balance, because the level between the macros and micros of life is feasible. Meaning that it must be distinguished in time. The failure to do so leads to a cognitive loss of mental amplitude by placing biases on time. No matter how one looks at it. We must learn to identify time as what it is, and place one in the natural stage of environmental adeptness.

"To be consistently evolutionary is the only way to solve pending problems."

P.S. This can be sought at the zero-point of thought.

Bona Fide "Thesis, antithesis, synthesize." -Socrates

Everyone must be attentive to the world around them, including people and the nature that resides between them. At the same time, containing that exact sensitivity to themselves. We are all displacements of nature and possibility. We have decent understanding behind our environment, but the complete comprehension of the capability is in downfall. There is two possibilities, knowing and not knowing. We have to comprehend both. Meaning that, if we completely comprehend the root of these, we will become cognitively more intelligent as a species. The greater identity of the multitudes of knowledge appreciates to everyone around you with the loss of egotism, and the elevation of opened-mindedness to a higher collective answer. One can only know a more appropriate solution; if one observes all the current one's. Hence, thinking holistically about the validity of the proposed new concept. Article IV will be continued on a later date due to its large consistency.

To-do list: Article IV

• Proliferate knowledge of all occupancies
  
• Master our integrity
  
• Introduce open-mindedness through collective endeavor

To-do list: Article V

• Prove amplifying complexity over time
  
• Close the loop hole on destructive humane characteristics and traits

To-do list: Epilogue

• State collective wisdom is positive